Manufacturing and supply chain agent execution and control plane

Industrial agent control

Coordinate factory, supplier, quality, and field work with explicit action limits.

Bring together ERP, MES, PLM, quality, supplier, maintenance, and field data so agents can help resolve exceptions, reduce downtime, and protect controlled information.

ERP and procurement
MES and production records
PLM and engineering change
QMS and CAPA
Supplier portals
Maintenance and field service

What changes in the daily workflow

Each example starts with the work that slows down today, then names the context, controls, and outcome a pilot would need to verify.

Production exception resolution

Operational teams chase root cause across MES events, maintenance records, supplier lots, work instructions, and quality data.

Agents assemble line-specific context, identify likely owners, and draft next actions with controlled data boundaries.

Controls to verify: Plant role scopes; QMS evidence; Supplier data limits; Supervisor approval.

  • Reduced downtime
  • Faster root cause analysis
  • Clearer shift handoffs

Supplier and procurement risk

Procurement teams need supplier, contract, quality, cyber, and logistics context before approving changes.

The platform links supplier history, obligations, defects, alternate parts, and risk controls into one review workflow.

Controls to verify: Supplier segmentation; Contract terms; Risk scoring; Approval evidence.

  • Faster supplier reviews
  • Lower disruption risk
  • Better sourcing decisions

Engineering change intelligence

Design, manufacturing, and quality teams struggle to understand downstream impact of engineering changes.

S/Runtime maps affected parts, documents, suppliers, customers, training, and compliance steps before action.

Controls to verify: PLM permissions; CUI handling; Change approvals; Traceability.

  • Safer change rollout
  • Less rework
  • Better compliance confidence

Controls to verify before production access

The pilot scope should identify the applicable policy, the accountable reviewer, and the evidence required to reconstruct a consequential run.

ISO/IEC 27001

Focus: Information security management, risk management, confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

S/Runtime: Control mapping, evidence collection, access reviews, incident context, and risk-based workflow scopes.

NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC

Focus: Controlled unclassified information and federal contract information safeguards for defense-related work.

S/Runtime: CUI tagging, export-controlled context boundaries, contractor access reviews, and assessment evidence packages.

ITAR/EAR-aware operations

Focus: Export-controlled technical data, country/person access, and collaboration boundaries where applicable.

S/Runtime: Restricted context scopes, human approval for controlled data use, and audit evidence for access decisions.

Quality and safety management

Focus: Controlled procedures, deviations, corrective actions, training, and production evidence.

S/Runtime: SOP-grounded agents, CAPA context, training checks, and controlled-record lineage.

Put permissions, review, and evidence inside the run.

Choose the baseline before the pilot starts.

Downtime investigation time

Use workflow run traces and reviewer outcomes to compare “Downtime investigation time” with the agreed pre-pilot baseline.

Supplier exception cycle time

Use workflow run traces and reviewer outcomes to compare “Supplier exception cycle time” with the agreed pre-pilot baseline.

Engineering change readiness

Use workflow run traces and reviewer outcomes to compare “Engineering change readiness” with the agreed pre-pilot baseline.

Quality review backlog

Use workflow run traces and reviewer outcomes to compare “Quality review backlog” with the agreed pre-pilot baseline.

Architecture session

Bring one consequential workflow. Leave with a governed agent blueprint.

We will map the context, systems, decisions, controls, actions, and success measures together.

Talk to an architect